Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 102 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (5,328)·Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral tones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Ultra Fair skin with beige undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very light skin with neutral beige undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same radiant finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: ivory shade with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair to light with neutral golden undertones
The closest shade to Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 102 (Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation in N3, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 102. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade102Closest shade matchN3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#f8dac6#f7d7c0Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 76/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Light Neutral, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 102. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade102Closest overall alternativeLight NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#f8dac6#f3d3bdVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $23.41 more
