Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 312 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (5,328)·Medium light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium-Tan skin with a peachy-golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium light tan, bright-golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium skin with golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium-Tan skin with a golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: M2.5 - medium with warm undertones, and a peach tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium skin with peachy-gold undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium with golden undertones
The closest shade to Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 312 (Medium light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Clinique Daily Calm Makeup Balm Foundation in Light Medium 1, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 312. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade312Closest shade matchLight Medium 1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#dfa673#dfa775Looks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 4 - Vier, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 312. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade312Closest overall alternativeShade: 4 - VierHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#dfa673#daa272Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $42.01 more
