Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 112 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (5,328)·Fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with pink undertones
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (22%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair, cool-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for light skin with peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 112 (Fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fièra Cosmetics All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation in Beige, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 112. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade112Closest shade matchBeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#f3c7b1#f5c8b1Looks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionNot statedLightNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 89/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
LIXR Beauty Multi-Use Cream-to-Powder Concealer & Foundation Stick in Toffee 3N, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 112. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade112Closest overall alternativeToffee 3NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#f3c7b1#f7c9b3Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.3
Retailer descriptionNot statedLightNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 91/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $42.01 more
Walmart
Target
