Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 355 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (5,328)·Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium - deep with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Deep-Tan skin with a golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: MD5 - medium-deep to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.99 less (11%)4.5 (15,723)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: golden caramel with warm undertone
The closest shade to Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C 355 (Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte Foundation in Hazelnut, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 355. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade355Closest shade matchHazelnutHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#b16e3f#af6d3dLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 81/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Forever Skin Glow Foundation in 6W Warm, against Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 355. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade355Closest overall alternative6W WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#b16e3f#ae6d43Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 88/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
SephoraCosts $10.01 more
