Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation P3 dupes and alternatives Natasha Denona
4.5 (2,944)·Light medium · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light-Medium skin with a neutral undertone
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (6%)4.3 (600)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$38 less (73%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a neutral undertone
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (33%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
64
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation P3 (Light medium · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 Foundation in C3.5, against Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation in P3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP3Closest shade matchC3.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#e2ac8a#e2ac87Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared35
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall61
Longevity30%7018-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 18-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall30
Skin type100%30Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, oilyBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 74/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Waterproof Foundation in 3W0 Sandstone, against Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation in P3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP3Closest overall alternative3W0 SandstoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#e2ac8a#dca685Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$36.01 less (69%)
