True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation Cabana dupes and alternatives Range Beauty
4.2 (99)·Deep · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Deep - Neutral with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Light-medium rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light-medium rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D4 - deep with warm undertones, and a red tone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: Very deep with golden undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral, subtle golden undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep/dark with golden undertones
The closest shade to Range Beauty True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation Cabana (Deep · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Juvia's Place I Am Magic Velvety Matte Foundation in 200 Kenya, against Range Beauty True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation in Cabana. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCabanaClosest shade match200 KenyaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#8d4324#8c421fLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 79/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 54H Deep Honey, against Range Beauty True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation in Cabana. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCabanaClosest overall alternative54H Deep HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#8d4324#864925Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 89/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $7.50 more
