True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation Rio dupes and alternatives Range Beauty
4.2 (99)·Medium tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: Medium Deep - Neutral with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: M5.25 - medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: MD3.6 - Medium-deep to deep with warm undertones, and a red tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: MD3.3 - Medium-deep to deep with warm undertones, and a red tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: MD3.3 - medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan with golden peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Range Beauty True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation Rio (Medium tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 36 Medium Deep Warm, against Range Beauty True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation in Rio. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRioClosest shade match36 Medium Deep WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#c57c47#cd7d42Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Polite Society More Than a Pretty Face Skin-Caring Foundation in Very Tan Warm, against Range Beauty True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation in Rio. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRioClosest overall alternativeVery Tan WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%89#c57c47#c48353Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $7.50 more
