Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer 530N dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.2 (2,558)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium-full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for oily/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium-full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Luminous rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: for very deep cool skin with a red hue
Differences: Medium-full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
25
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
25
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle brown undertones
The closest shade to Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer 530N (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer in NC58, against Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 530N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade530NClosest shade matchNC58How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#8d5838#8d5831Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionDeepVery deepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 79/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Medium Deep 3, against Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 530N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade530NClosest overall alternativeMedium Deep 3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#8d5838#875d40Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Oily, dry, combination, normalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $6 more
