Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation F12.7NC dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.5 (10)·Tan · Neutral · neutral pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: MD5.5 - Medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium/Tan with Warm Yellow Undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan, neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation F12.7NC (Tan · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Revolution Beauty Conceal & Define Soft Matte Full Coverage Foundation in F12.7NC, against Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F12.7NC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF12.7NCClosest shade matchF12.7NCHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#b47c41#ba7a48Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 79/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
LORAC PRO Soft Focus Longwear Foundation in 17, against Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F12.7NC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF12.7NCClosest overall alternative17How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour60%79#b47c41#b98555Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 4.4
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 84/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $29.20 more
Sephora
