Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation F13.7NW dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.5 (10)·Deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 25
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: dark to deep with a neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: warm, golden brown that pops on undertones with sunlit depth
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin with warm golden undertones
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (36%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same olive undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D2 - deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Same olive undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin with very warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark skin w/ cool to neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral bronze undertones
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation F13.7NW (Deep · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
about-face THE PERFORMER Skin-Focused Foundation in D1OLIVE, against Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F13.7NW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF13.7NWClosest matchD1OLIVEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#985b21#98591eLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 89/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $41 more
