Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation F19NW dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.5 (10)·Rich deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep to rich - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark rich - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: mid deep to rich - neutral, slightly warm
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 60% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep skin tones with a warm undertone
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for the deepest darkest skin w/ a neutral undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 60% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: dark or deep skin tones with an olive undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation F19NW (Rich deep · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
NYX Professional Makeup Make 'EM Wonder, 24H Soft Matte Foundation in Deep Ebony, against Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F19NW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF19NWClosest shade matchDeep EbonyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%88#3c0d00#340e01Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I Am Magic Velvety Matte Foundation in 120 Chad, against Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F19NW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF19NWClosest overall alternative120 ChadHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%76#3c0d00#441c10Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3.99 more
