Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light/Medium with Warm Undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as medium, yours as fair· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as fair · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium golden olive
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as fair
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation F6.2NC (Medium · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 111M, against Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F6.2NC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF6.2NCClosest match111MHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%96#ce9869#d19769Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionFairLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 86/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $28 more
Target
Sephora
