Cashmere Matte Eyelights Canyon Clay dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.8 (709)·Red · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than red· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than red · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than red· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than red · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (23%)4.3 (828)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than red
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than red · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than red· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than red · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than red· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than red · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than red
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than red
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than red· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than red · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Terracotta rather than red· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than red · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I am Powerful, against RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Canyon Clay. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCanyon ClayClosest matchI am PowerfulHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%73#a95e40#ae5c4aClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared50
Longevity50%208-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Overall match 82/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta Beauty$7 less (23%)
Sephora
