Cashmere Matte Eyelights Tundra Taupe dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.8 (709)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
71
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
28
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Chocolate Bite, against RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Tundra Taupe. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTundra TaupeClosest shade matchChocolate BiteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#ecc0a5#edbda6Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%408-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 64/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Nectar, against RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Tundra Taupe. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTundra TaupeClosest overall alternativeNectarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#ecc0a5#f8c5a8Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall78
Longevity50%808-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $8 more
Walmart
