Cashmere Matte Eyelights Mallo Coast dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.8 (709)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Red rather than mauve· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than mauve · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: soft rosy-pink shade with a matte finish
Differences: Red rather than mauve· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than mauve · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Copper rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than mauve · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Copper rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Copper rather than mauve · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Red rather than mauve· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Red rather than mauve · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
28
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · 14-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Let's Roll, against RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Mallo Coast. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMallo CoastClosest shade matchLet's RollHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%85#bf655e#c86d64Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared7
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Longevity50%808-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Overall match 62/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Mauvelous Matte, against RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Mallo Coast. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMallo CoastClosest overall alternativeMauvelous MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%63#bf655e#a5665cSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared93
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 81/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$22 less (73%)
