Timeless Hydrating Foundation 60H Mahogany Honey dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (38)·Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: dark neutral with rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep warm with slightly neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: D2 - Deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Extra deep with golden undertones
The closest shade to Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation 60H Mahogany Honey (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
R.E.M. Beauty Sweetener Foundation in rich 2 w, against Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation in 60H Mahogany Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade60H Mahogany HoneyClosest shade matchrich 2 wHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#76422a#75442dLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveCombinationBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 28D, against Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation in 60H Mahogany Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade60H Mahogany HoneyClosest overall alternative28DHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#76422a#764328Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 92/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $8 more
