Timeless Hydrating Foundation 62H Espresso Honey dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (38)·Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep neutral with cool blue undertones
$40Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (5%)3.9 (148)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep rich with warm undertones
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (7%)4.3 (6,833)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$33 less (79%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D8 - Very rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation 62H Espresso Honey (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 9 - NEUN, against Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation in 62H Espresso Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Maracuja Juicy Glow Tint in 59H Rich Honey, against Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation in 62H Espresso Honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade62H Espresso HoneyClosest overall alternative59H Rich HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#603a31#683c2fVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $10 more
