Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than brown· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: Light tan with cool undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Patrick Ta Major Sculpt Crème Contour & Powder Bronzer Duo in She's Sculpted, against Ulta Beauty Collection Soft Focus Cream-to-Powder Contour Stick in Light Cool. Matched on the contour pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight CoolClosest shade matchShe's SculptedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour50%93#c59075#bf8b72Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth25%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone19%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family6%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared67
Finish60%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format20%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared57
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, OilySome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario SoftSculpt Cream Contour & Bronzer Shaping Stick in Light, against Ulta Beauty Collection Soft Focus Cream-to-Powder Contour Stick in Light Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight CoolClosest overall alternativeLightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour50%93#c59075#ca9272Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared55
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%70DryDry, Normal, Combination, OilySome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $20 more
