Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow Cedar Matte dupes and alternatives Winky Lux
4.9 (122)·Taupe · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Lighter· Terracotta rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Terracotta rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
30
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (53%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Plum rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Need It Nude, against Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Cedar Matte. Matched on pan 8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCedar MatteClosest shade matchNeed It NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#956a62#91695fVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPaletteDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 10S Chestnut, against Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Cedar Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCedar MatteClosest overall alternative10S ChestnutHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%85#956a62#926664Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 89/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $1 more
