Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow Chamomile Matte dupes and alternatives Winky Lux
4.9 (122)·Nude · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (11%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in Shadow Starstruck, against Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Chamomile Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChamomile MatteClosest shade matchShadow StarstruckHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#c99e8f#ca9f8eLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall48
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Panna Cotta, against Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Chamomile Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChamomile MatteClosest overall alternativePanna CottaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%93#c99e8f#ca9b88Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Longevity50%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$8.50 less (45%)
