Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow Magnolia Shimmer dupes and alternatives Winky Lux
4.9 (122)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (26%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm champagne with silver & pink pinpoints
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white and gold metallic glitter
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Top Off, against Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Magnolia Shimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMagnolia ShimmerClosest matchTop OffHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#f3ddd3#f2dbd0Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Overall match 92/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$10.01 less (53%)
