Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow Primrose Shimmer dupes and alternatives Winky Lux
4.9 (122)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sheer silvery baby pink with silver and pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rose quartz with a lavender shift
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (63%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 70M Sakura, against Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Primrose Shimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePrimrose ShimmerClosest shade match70M SakuraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#eed3d6#eccbd0Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall48
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Overall match 78/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Love Spell, against Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Primrose Shimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePrimrose ShimmerClosest overall alternativeLove SpellHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%84#eed3d6#f9d6ddClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall68
Finish65%61ShimmerDuochromeSome differenceDuochrome finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 79/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$10.01 less (53%)
