Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium shade, neutral undertone
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 4W (Light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.