Fractal Glitter Eye Paint Augmented Reality dupes and alternatives about-face
3.5 (165)·Green · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (17%)4.0 (271)
Shimmer · Opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmer mint with pink reflects
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (50%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (17%)4.0 (271)
Duochrome · Opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome light green with pink reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: emerald green to gold to teal
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (50%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 160 Cancelled, against about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Augmented Reality. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAugmented RealityClosest match160 CancelledHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#c4cb96#c3ce90Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.