Fractal Glitter Eye Paint Tin Pan Alley dupes and alternatives about-face
3.5 (165)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Silver rather than golden· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Silver rather than golden · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than golden· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: modern beige, java jazz, & cocoa dip
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: White rather than golden· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 103 First Light, against about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Tin Pan Alley. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTin Pan AlleyClosest shade match103 First LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#eaded2#e9dad1Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 76/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Top Off, against about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Tin Pan Alley. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTin Pan AlleyClosest overall alternativeTop OffHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%70#eaded2#f2dbd0Close colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 86/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $11 more
