Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Claims hydration
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
ILIA Lip Sketch Hydrating Crayon in Pampas, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Full-Pigment Matte & Satin Velvet Lipstick in Peach Amber. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeach AmberClosest matchPampasHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%87#d26255#c7685dVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared78
Finish55%78SatinMatteCloseMatte finish rather than satin
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $9 more
Walmart
