Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: satin· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
28
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a warm candy pink to make everyone wink
NARS Afterglow Lipstick in Orgasm 777, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Full-Pigment Matte & Satin Velvet Lipstick in Tease. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTeaseClosest matchOrgasm 777How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall83
Colour60%75#f6b1ac#f0a2a4Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightLightSameDepth difference 6.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall44
Finish55%26SatinShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than satin
Opacity45%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 77/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
CVS
Walmart
