Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (76%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (76%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Same format: stick
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Looks identical · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: deeper to very deep skin tones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep skin tones, neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for deep skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Haus Labs Precision Sculpt Shaping Balm Contour Stick in Curve, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Cream Contour Stick in Core Shadow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCore ShadowClosest matchCurveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour50%86#4c312a#503024Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared84
Finish60%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format20%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%40Normal, CombinationNormal, Oily, SensitiveSome differenceBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (76%)
