Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: contour, cool neutral undertone for light medium skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep tan with warm bronzer and cool contour
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: medium bronze with warm undertones
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
52
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
52
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
52
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
CoverGirl Trublend Skin Enhancer Balm Contour Stick in Sculpted, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Cream Contour Stick in Shadow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShadowClosest shade matchSculptedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour50%93#98705a#9c6e56Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall93
Finish60%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format20%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Match Stix Contour Skinstick in Mocha, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Cream Contour Stick in Shadow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShadowClosest overall alternativeMochaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour50%89#98705a#996b51Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall80
Finish60%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format20%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%40Normal, CombinationNormal, Dry, OilySome differenceBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.