Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shadow for fair to light skin tones with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light with neutral, cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: for medium tan – tan complexions
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than taupe· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than taupe · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: contour, cool undertone for light to medium skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
52
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for light skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for light to light-medium skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
52
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Sephora Collection Cream Contour Stick in 01 Fair to Light, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Cream Contour Stick in Greyscale. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGreyscaleClosest match01 Fair to LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour50%80#a58977#a58a80Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish60%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$6 less (18%)
