Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: light tan with warm undertone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims hydration
Differences: Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium with warm neutral undertone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium bronze with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than bronze · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than bronze · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
93
Looks identical · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: warms light to light medium skin tones
Bobbi Brown Matte Bronzing Powder in Light, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Beach Bum Bronze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeach Bum BronzeClosest shade matchLightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%95#c3957e#c9977dLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family5%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Medium, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Beach Bum Bronze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeach Bum BronzeClosest overall alternativeMediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%72#c3957e#cc926dClose colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family5%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%87Normal, CombinationNormal, Combination, OilyCloseBoth marketed for normal, combination skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.