Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Does not claim comfort· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with warm undertone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium to medium-deep with golden neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than bronze · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: for fair to light complexions
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium-deep to deep with golden neutral undertone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: nude pink / light to tan with neutral undertones
Westman Atelier Sun Tone Hydrating Matte Bronzing Drops in Soleil Parfait 4, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Sunset Sizzle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunset SizzleClosest shade matchSoleil Parfait 4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%91#8d675a#8b6359Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%40Normal, CombinationNormal, Dry, OilySome differenceBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Givenchy Prisme Libre 4-Color Blurring & Sculpting Bronzer Powder in 002- Popeline Bronzée, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Sunset Sizzle. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunset SizzleClosest overall alternative002- Popeline BronzéeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%84#8d675a#946354Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 94/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.