Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than golden· Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than golden · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: light brown with neutral warm undertone
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Oily, Combination, Dry, Normal, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light bronze with champagne swirls
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Ulta Beauty Collection Oh My Glow Baked Bronzer in Light/Medium, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Sun-Kissed Dreams. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSun-Kissed DreamsClosest shade matchLight/MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#bc9a89#c19683Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared63
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared20
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0Normal, CombinationDryDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 74/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe Cheek Thrills Bronze & Tone Duo in Capri Cabana, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Sun-Kissed Dreams. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSun-Kissed DreamsClosest overall alternativeCapri CabanaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour55%50#bc9a89#ce9e78Slight colour differenceColour difference 7.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.