Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Does not claim comfort· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light with warm bronzer and cool contour
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium bronze with warm undertones
Ulta Beauty Collection Oh My Glow Baked Bronzer in Light/Medium, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Warm Sand Vibes. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWarm Sand VibesClosest shade matchLight/MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%79#b3927f#c19683Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth25%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared63
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared20
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0Normal, CombinationDryDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 70/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Nudestix NUDIES MATTE All Over Face Bronze Color in Bondi Belle, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Warm Sand Vibes. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWarm Sand VibesClosest overall alternativeBondi BelleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour55%66#b3927f#ac8568Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%84LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 85/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$1 less (3%)
Sephora
