Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer Golden Beach Glow dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.8 (992)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
93
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: A medium tan shade fused with Luminous Light, a champagne pearl powder, for a softer, candlelit warmth. Ideal for fair/light complexions.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium bronze with warm undertones
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Does not claim comfort· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for light skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium with warm bronzer and cool contour
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than golden· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: for fair to light complexions
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light/medium bronze with neutral undertones
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: for medium to deep complexions
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: for light to medium complexions
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel bronze / tan marble glow
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Nudestix NUDIES MATTE All Over Face Bronze Color in Bondi Belle, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Golden Beach Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden Beach GlowClosest shade matchBondi BelleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#a9876e#ac8568Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared45
Finish50%45DewyMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 82/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Bronzer in Tan Lines, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Golden Beach Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden Beach GlowClosest overall alternativeTan LinesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour55%60#a9876e#bb825fSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family5%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20 more
