Silky-Soft Powder Blush Blossy dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.6 (5,486)·Apricot · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than apricot· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than apricot· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than apricot · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than apricot· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than apricot· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than apricot · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than apricot· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than apricot · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft peach (swish and pop glow)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than apricot· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than apricot · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: soft peach, bronze, and warm pink, for medium skin tones.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than apricot· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than apricot· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown / nude rather than apricot· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft rose beige (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than apricot· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than apricot · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than apricot· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than apricot · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Terracotta rather than apricot· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than apricot · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: soft cinnamon sparked with sweet pink
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than apricot· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than apricot · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than apricot
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Balm rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Balm rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Brown / nude rather than apricot· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown / nude rather than apricot · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 217 Miel Glace, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Blossy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlossyClosest shade match217 Miel GlaceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%92#d88b73#da927cVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 75/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Gingerly, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Blossy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlossyClosest overall alternativeGingerlyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%92#d88b73#d6846bVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.