Silky-Soft Powder Blush Crystah dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.6 (5,486)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Coral rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Coral rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: coral with gold glowy shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Hourglass Unreal Liquid Blush in Whim, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Crystah. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrystahClosest shade matchWhimHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#ef666b#e96c72Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall66
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall72
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Benefit Cosmetics Benetint Liquid Lip & Cheek Stain in Playtint, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Crystah. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrystahClosest overall alternativePlaytintHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%88#ef666b#f65f6fVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.