Silky-Soft Powder Blush Dandelion dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.6 (5,486)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm romantic nude (swish and pop glow)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft peach (swish and pop glow)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Stain rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stain rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 6 Rose Haze, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Dandelion. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDandelionClosest shade match6 Rose HazeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#f0a49c#f0a096Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Baby Girl, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Dandelion. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDandelionClosest overall alternativeBaby GirlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#f0a49c#efa8a2Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.