Silky-Soft Powder Blush Moone dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.6 (5,486)·Berry · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Red rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: A burgundy with golden shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Red rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: satin· Same format: powder
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than berry· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than berry · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Pink rather than berry· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than berry · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than berry· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than berry · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: a brick red combined with radiant light to recreate a vibrant fireside gleam
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than berry· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than berry · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand in Berry Radiant, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Moone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMooneClosest shade matchBerry RadiantHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%89#98444d#8d464cVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall69
Finish50%78SatinDewyCloseDewy finish rather than satin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
DIBS Beauty Duet Baked Blush Duo in Backstage, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Moone. Matched on the deeper blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMooneClosest overall alternativeBackstageHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%94#98444d#93474cVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 83/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
