Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks Blushed Rose dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.5 (675)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: dirty cool mauve with pink pearl
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Terracotta rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Terracotta rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Red rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (25%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Both claim comfort· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format)
R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in opening night, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Blushed Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlushed RoseClosest shade matchopening nightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%80#a25153#a9515dClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall71
Finish50%67SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Cheeks Out Freestyle Cream Blush in RiRi, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Blushed Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlushed RoseClosest overall alternativeRiRiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%72#a25153#a4505fClose colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall95
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$23.01 less (64%)
Sephora
