Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks Pink Flame dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.5 (675)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format)
Retailer shade note: muted pink - mauve / deep plum
Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Hibiscus Haze, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Pink Flame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink FlameClosest shade matchHibiscus HazeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%90#d25f6a#cc5c6cVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint in At Last, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Pink Flame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink FlameClosest overall alternativeAt LastHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour55%80#d25f6a#c0656dClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $2 more
