Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks Powder Pink dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.5 (675)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (6%)4.8 (818)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims waterproof· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort
Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P72 Dahlia, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Powder Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePowder PinkClosest shade matchP72 DahliaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#d47b7a#d87678Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%67SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Glow Play Cushiony Blush in Cheer Up, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Powder Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePowder PinkClosest overall alternativeCheer UpHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%81#d47b7a#d88177Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall89
Finish50%78SatinDewyCloseDewy finish rather than satin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautySame price
