Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks Pale Pink dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.5 (675)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: satin· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (69%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: watermelon with cool undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
DIBS Beauty Duet Baked Blush Duo in VIP Pink, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Pale Pink. Matched on the deeper blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePale PinkClosest matchVIP PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%82#cb6885#cc5a7fClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightMediumCloseDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%78SatinDewyCloseDewy finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.