Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks Rose dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.5 (675)·Rose · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (69%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Coral rather than rose· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than rose · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep rose bronze with shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream
Differences: Red rather than rose· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than rose · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Red rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than rose· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than rose · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Too Faced Cloud Crush Whipped Lip & Cheek Color in Headliner, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRoseClosest shade matchHeadlinerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%88#b54950#b23e49Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Finish50%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Pigmentation25%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%—not comparableCreamNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Blush Drops in Field of Roses, against Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRoseClosest overall alternativeField of RosesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour55%70#b54950#c62f42Close colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall79
Finish50%78SatinDewyCloseDewy finish rather than satin
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$26 less (72%)
Sephora
