Clean Fresh Skin Milk Foundation Deep/Dark dupes and alternatives CoverGirl
4.1 (11,038)·Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: tan with golden olive undertone
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep tan with neutral olive undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· No fragrance listed· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same radiant finish· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
46
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Dark shade with warm undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims a skin-like finish· No fragrance listed
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
The closest shade to CoverGirl Clean Fresh Skin Milk Foundation Deep/Dark (Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Urban Decay Hydromaniac Hydrating Dewy Foundation in 55, against CoverGirl Clean Fresh Skin Milk Foundation in Deep/Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep/DarkClosest shade match55How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#936e54#8f6e53Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oilyNormal, dryBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals ORIGINAL Loose Talc-Free Mineral Powder Foundation SPF 15 in Golden Deep 28, against CoverGirl Clean Fresh Skin Milk Foundation in Deep/Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep/DarkClosest overall alternativeGolden Deep 28How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%83#936e54#92664aClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 81/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $26.01 more
