Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Fair 125 C dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (2,230)·Fair · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily skin
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
25
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily skin
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
25
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for very fair skin with rosy neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
25
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily skin · No SPF
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Fair 125 C (Fair · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation in 14 Fair Cool, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Fair 125 C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 125 CClosest match14 Fair CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#efcba7#f2ccaaLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionFairFairBoth described as fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $33 more
