Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Caramel dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Medium · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: tan to deep with a golden undertone
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Deep Caramel (Medium · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 32 Tan Bronze, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Deep Caramel. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep CaramelClosest match32 Tan BronzeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#d19269#cf936eLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 93/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $22 more
