Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Neutral dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: medium fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan with neutral/golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: MD1.5 - Medium to medium-deep with warm undertones, and a peach tone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than satin finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than satin finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm peach undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Neutral (Light · Warm undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
NYX Professional Makeup Bare With Me Hydrating Face & Body Concealer Serum in Golden, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium NeutralClosest shade matchGoldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#f1b786#efb27bVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.3
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared63
Finish35%78SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, combination, normalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Medium 2, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium NeutralClosest overall alternativeMedium 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%82#f1b786#f6c495Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87LightFairCloseDepth difference: 5.5
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared79
Finish35%78SatinRadiantCloseRadiant finish rather than satin
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, combination, normalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $16 more
