Hydrating Camo Concealer Fair Rose dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: light+ with cool pink undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.4 - light with neutral undertones, and a light peach tone
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Fair Rose (Light · Cool · pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 25.5 Medium Bronze, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Fair Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair RoseClosest match25.5 Medium BronzeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#e9b999#e8b391Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.4
Retailer descriptionFairNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 92/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $28 more
