Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as medium tan· Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as medium tan · Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: L2.8 - Light to medium with warm undertones, and a peach tone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium tan
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer 290 (Very fair · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 5.4, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer in 290. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade290Closest shade match5.4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%91#fecfa9#f6cba2Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Very fairFairCloseDepth difference: 2.6
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, combination, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Macadamia, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer in 290. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade290Closest overall alternativeMacadamiaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%89#fecfa9#f3c8a0Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91Very fairFairCloseDepth difference: 4.1
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 84/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
View at Target